Tuesday, January 30, 2007
Kristi Wachter has been admittedly dishonest herself and also has suggested others lie if they were asked about their actions. I don't think it's merely coincidental that she accuses others of lying. It often happens that if someone screams loudly against something, you'll find it's the thing they keep doing themselves.
Monday, January 29, 2007
"Faith" in the government
Kristi Wachter wrote that it's okay for psychiatry to lock up someone because there's "appropriate government oversight." Right! Would you trust the government to oversee your psychiatric lock-up? Who is this woman working for anyway? Are you thinking what I'm thinking?
Sunday, January 28, 2007
Helpful Kristi
Isn't that absurd? Kristi Wachter gives the homeless candy. What would she do if someone was hungry? If someone was hurt? Do you get the idea that her elevator doesn't go all the way to the top floor?
Friday, January 26, 2007
That's smart
I just read what Kristi Wachter said when she was asked if she was concerned about homeless people. She said, "Absolutely. I give 'em candy." I kid you not! I wonder what she'd give someone who was hungry. Maybe candy fixes everything for her. Okay, chocolate maybe.
Yeah, yeah, yeah
Ever heard of someone trying too hard to be convincing. That's Kristi Wachter for you.
Wednesday, January 24, 2007
Just the facts ma'am
Just because someone said something and then others repeated it -- no matter how many times -- does not a fact make. If you get my drift. Nevertheless, these are Kristi Wachter's "facts." If they weren't so ridiculous and preposterous, I'd laugh.
Why, I ask
Back to my original idea for this blog. That is, I wondered what would motivate Kristi Wachter to waste her time and energy on something she admittedly knows almost nothing about. The operative word there is ADMITTEDLY. There is no hiding the fact that she has next to nothing in the way of experience or knowledge of what she harps about. But she's not going to let that stop her, no sir-eee. Minor details.
Agenda
When someone already has an agenda (like Kristi Wachter), they seek out and hook up with people who support it. We all know people like that. Watch out for back-stabbers who smile to your face. It's not pretty and it's not right, but not everyone is honest about their intentions.
Tuesday, January 23, 2007
Evening
What I want to do with this blog is shine some light on Kristi Wachter's activities and real agenda. You know what they say about fooling all the people all the time -- not possible. When given the truth, people open their eyes.
Sunday, January 21, 2007
An analogy
If you were interested in dating a particular person, say, would you go to their ex-boyfriend (or ex-girlfriend) and find out "all about" them? I don't think so. If you're like me, you'd get to know the person yourself and make up your own mind. Kristi Wachter only talks with the ex's (who have their own issues, by the way). That's not for me.
Here's another one
Truth. What is the meaning? I found a number of definitions, but here's one I liked: "honesty; integrity; truthfulness." What would you think of someone who didn't even know you -- and admitted it! But nevertheless had a hidden agenda and made it their life's work to spread lies about you? This leads to the next question. What do you think of Kristi Wachter?
Friday, January 19, 2007
Oh . . .
Funny. Someone reading my blog on Kristi Wachter called it kooky. Since I don't know the person, I had one of those, "Thanks! I think," moments. Can kooky be cool, unusual, out of the ordinary?
Thursday, January 18, 2007
Who is she?
It's well-known that Kristi Wachter has been less than truthful about who she was and her identity. And, folks, that's an understatement. What are the liar's other lies? The untruth teller's other untruths?
Speaking of the dark side
Ever been in a funk where everything seemed threatening? (I know, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean nobody's out to get you) Joking aside, when you're standing in the shadows yourself, how can you judge what's good or bad? What works or doesn't work? What helps or doesn't?
Okay, one more
Just one more definition. Truth. Maybe you guessed it? Here's the first definition: the true or actual state of a matter. Personally, I'm not seeing any of this in Kristi Wachter's writings or actions. It seems she's on the dark side and that colors what she sees. Too bad. Life doesn't have to be a dark place.
Monday, January 15, 2007
Back at you
Here is another, "I'm not . . . (fill in the blank)" from Kristi Wachter. This time it's "a bigot." Again, take at look. The first definition from dictionary.com is: "a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion." Not looking good for Kristi Wachter's use of the English language.
Sunday, January 14, 2007
Let's define our terms
I'm having fun with defining terms that Kristi Wachter is using. See my last post for the definition of intolerant. There will be more . . .
Saturday, January 13, 2007
Say what?
Kristi Wachter denies she is intolerant. Let's see. Here's the first definition of "intolerant" I found at dictionary.com:
1. not tolerating or respecting beliefs, opinions, usages, manners, etc., different from one's own, as in political or religious matters; bigoted.
Make up your own mind.
1. not tolerating or respecting beliefs, opinions, usages, manners, etc., different from one's own, as in political or religious matters; bigoted.
Make up your own mind.
Tuesday, January 09, 2007
Funny?
Call me humor-challenged, but I don't think it's very funny for Kristi Wachter to "parody" other people's religion. I think it's pretty down-right insensitive. And that's what she says she does.
Tuesday, January 02, 2007
A thought . . .
I'm thinking there is the distinct possibility that Kristi Wachter is a just good person who has been so brainwashed that things look upside down to her. What is right and wrong, and how can you tell the difference anyway? One way to look at it is, are her actions destructive? No question about that.